Thursday, May 15, 2008

Costly lesson
writes Joanne McCarthy
1576 words
19 January 2008
Late
4
English
© 2008 Copyright John Fairfax Holdings Limited. www.fd.com.au

COVER STORY

NEWCASTLE University students are in such dire financial straits that some a tiny number, it is true have even married to finish their studies.

"You have a registry wedding and take proof of your marriage to Centrelink which shows you're independent of your parents so you can get the student allowance," said a student whose friend, a male, took the marriage option but refused to discuss it with a journalist because "it's a loophole, and some people are that desperate they need it".

"I was approached to do it, too, but I couldn't, although I can see why some people do. I know of other people who've done it or considered it," the student said.

Centrelink confirmed marriage, or living in a "marriage-like" arrangement, overcomes the independence test but the marriage must be for 12 months, or six months in special circumstances.

Newcastle University vice-chancellor Nick Saunders laughed when asked if he knew about students marrying to beat the independence rule requiring students to earn about $18,000 in 18 months before they can qualify for a student allowance of up to $355 a fortnight while living away from home.

But he acknowledged many students face extreme financial difficulties while trying to complete degrees, only to enter the workforce with considerable HECS debts at the end.

"I do know the whole issue of availability of student allowances is a serious one, but I haven't heard of anyone marrying, no," he said.

"The biggest change we've seen is students increasingly taking fewer subjects per year. They're staying in the system but it's all about survival and having to take on more and more jobs to fund their study."

More than 60 per cent of Australian students fail to qualify for the student allowance and have no access to income support. Those who do receive income support must report any earnings and have their allowance reduced if they work. Students have lost their allowances because Centrelink has deemed they have taken too long to complete their courses.

Welcome to university, Oz-style.

Newcastle University offered places to more than 8000 domestic and 3000 international students on Thursday night.

But earlier in the week the architect of the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS), Brian Chapman, repeated his long-held view that the tertiary education funding system is chaotic and student debt nudging $15 billion, with Newcastle University students owing a lot more than $250 million is out of control.

Private college and university graduates whose courses and debts are significantly higher than public university students are costing taxpayers much more than the original scheme in 1989 ever intended, Chapman said.

New ministers of religion, with church-subsidised housing but low incomes that mean they might never have to repay their HECS debt, are another unforeseen drain.

An apparent growing brain drain of students who graduate with big HECS debts and migrate to the US, the UK, Canada and Singapore to work has prompted Chapman to call for graduates to repay debts while overseas.

Other students, including retirees, might never be required to repay their HECS debts because they will never reach the annual income minimum of nearly $40,000 at which HECS must be repaid. It is not taken out of people's estates.

Vice-chancellor Saunders, and many others, are seriously concerned about the shift from public funding of universities to students that occurred over the 11 years of the Howard government, and are calling on the Rudd Government to make good its promises of dramatically cutting university fees by increasing overall tertiary education funding.

"If you look at university funding across the world, we are now a country where students are paying for a very high proportion of their education," Saunders said.

It's the inequities within the system that are of most concern.

"I feel pretty uncomfortable that a law student is paying for 85 per cent of their education while a medical student is paying for 30 per cent," he said.

Reduced federal funding, weighted government subsidies for certain courses and years of tinkering has meant "what we've ended up with, because of a piecemeal approach, often with good intentions, is a very strange beast", Saunders said.

The wider social and economic implications of having more than 1 million Australians with university debts prompted the Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations (CAPA) in 2003, and the National Tertiary Education Industry Union (NTEIU) in 2007, to call for urgent research in the area.

Both bodies cited a Senate report in 1997 when the new Howard government introduced a three tier, significantly more expensive university fee structure that said it was "crucial" that the social and economic impacts of the cost shift from government to students was monitored because of "uncertainty surrounding the impact of the new HECS".

The government subsequently disbanded the Higher Education Council, "effectively removing the only body monitoring the impact of HECS", the CAPA report noted.

Areas that needed to be investigated included how HECS debt affected the capacity of graduates to own a home, have a family and access private finance such as mortgages, personal loans and credit cards.

The CAPA and NTEIU reports found:

· While real Federal Government funding to universities doubled to $14 billion between 1996 and 2005, the government included HECS loans which are repaid by students in that figure so that the real purchasing power of the grants fell by 2.9 per cent over the period. This led the OECD to conclude in 2003 that Australia had the lowest share of public expenditure on tertiary education of all countries reported.

· Full-fee paying international students represented the most important source of revenue, jumping from $658 million (2005 dollar values) in 1996 to $2.135 billion in 2005.

· Australian Bureau of Statistics figures have shown the number of 25-34 year olds leaving the country to work in the US, Singapore, the UK and Canada was at record levels, leading CAPA to conclude that "increasing HECS debt will increase the disincentive for Australian professionals to remain in the country"; home ownership rates in that age bracket have dropped significantly, with the ABS concluding in 2002 that HECS had an impact on the national home ownership and rental markets.

· While Australian studies have found rising HECS fees have not had an impact on university enrolments, a British study on attitudes to debt found worrying differences between groups considering taking on debt. The most anti-debt were lone parents, people from low social classes and minority groups, while the least anti-debt were those who attended private schools, came from the highest social classes and men.

Nick Saunders this week said a "tipping point" beyond which students would not be able to see the benefits of taking on university debts was close to being reached.

BRYDIE Greedy, of Adamstown, will have a HECS debt of more than $20,000 when she finishes a five-year arts/science degree.

She is worried about feeling "trapped" into continuing the science portion of the degree after a year or two of study, because of the financial commitment she has already made.

"I don't come from a rich background in any sense so I'll be working and hopefully getting a student allowance," she said.

JONATHAN Moylan, a welfare officer with Newcastle University student union, is completing a three-year bachelor of arts degree, does not qualify for a student allowance, has no guarantee of a job when he graduates and often survives on $120 a week he earns as a tutor, with $90 of that paying for rent.

"I'm all the time hearing of students who've left university because they can't afford it anymore. That's why we call it student poverty, because it's real," he said.

The most disadvantaged students of all international full-fee paying students are often victims of unscrupulous landlords and employers, and face severe restrictions on their ability to work, he said.

"The message under the system we have is if you're a student, you really have no right to a standard of living," he said.

PHILLIPA Hutchings is an engineering student virtually guaranteed a $100,000 mining job when she graduates. Her HECS debt of $10,000, after paying for one year of study and receiving a scholarship for the second, is "not such a concern", she said. But friends without guaranteed high-paying jobs were obviously worried, she said.

CLAIRE Koller-Smith, 18, of Garden Suburb, has an invoice for an $8000 HECS debt after finishing her first year of a commerce/law degree. She hopes to do merchant banking, but knows she will almost certainly start her career as a relatively lowly-paid solicitor.

"It's a five-year course. It's a bit overwhelming to know that at my age I'm in that much debt already and it's going to get a lot bigger," she said. "I live at home. I wouldn't be able to study full-time if I didn't, and I know I have to get a good job at the end to be able to pay the debt back."

"Is it worth it? Hopefully, it will be."

"What we've ended up with, because of a piecemeal approach, often with good intentions, is a very strange beast." Nick Saunders

Document NEHR000020080120e41j00018

Hard to learn, if the texts are beyond pocket's reach


Sam Crosby
April 2, 2008
Advertisement

Student poverty is one of those things that baby boomers like to romanticise. They reminisce about recipes concocted from new and unusual combinations of staple household items. They regale us with tales of their prisoner of war-like resourcefulness, living for weeks at a time on a single bag of flour and using shampoo to wash hair, dishes and clothes. They remember these times and experiences fondly, euphemistically using terms such as "character building".

The problem for students in 2008 is far less "character building" and far more "long-term debt-building". Unlike our flower-power parents, we are spending far less time studying and far more time working, trying to pay the weekly bills so we can stay at university - and accrue an even larger HECS debt.

When the Hawke government established the Higher Education Contribution Scheme in 1983 it did so because it believed that lack of money shouldn't stop someone going to university. HECS was a great piece of enabling legislation. It made mass university education viable in the long term. Twenty-five years later, accessible and affordable tertiary education in Australia is being dramatically undermined by the cost of textbooks and course readers. A month into the academic year, many undergraduate students are finding out they have to shell out $600 in one hit on essential course materials and textbooks.

Textbooks are expensive. In America, course materials amounted to about 26 per cent of the total cost of tuition at public universities, found a 2005 study by the Accountability Office of the United States Government. It is a similar situation here. A single textbook can cost up to $250.

In theory, the HECS system takes this into account. Universities are not allowed to charge extra for course requirements which are regarded as essential - textbooks, laboratory equipment and course readers, for instance. The point is simple - universities shouldn't be getting a second crack at the cash cow after charging students for the course itself.

Over the past decade, however, many universities have learnt how to play the game. They do provide these essential materials for free, but there are usually few in relation to the number of students. There might be one course reader or textbook in the library, for example. Yes, that's right, for a subject with 300 enrolled students, a single course reader - a bundle of notes on the course and photocopied readings - is placed in the library for all to share. Remember, this is a textbook or course accompaniment that students are told is "essential", which is presumably why it gets stolen after the first week.

Another way universities can get around the requirement of providing essential materials is to simply list important textbooks as "optional". Students soon learn that these texts are optional in the same way passing the course is optional.

The skyrocketing costs associated with study are a main reason for students dropping out. That means good students are forced out of our universities because they can't afford the study materials.

This week, Australian Young Labor is launching a petition in every campus, in every state. We are asking students to petition the Federal Government to close the loopholes that universities have been jumping through. We are asking the Federal Government to allow the costs of textbooks and course readers to be deferred and included as a part of our HECS bill. We are asking the Federal Government to alleviate a massive burden on students and remove a financial barrier to getting an education.

Our solution to this problem would amount to a modest increase in the time it takes to pay off an overall debt, but would make the possibility of a decent education a reality for many students unable to pay their way now.

Sam Crosby is the national president of Australian Young Labor.

Student Poverty and Prostitution

Student poverty and prostitution

Amy McDonell
8 March 2008


Poverty is a dominant feature of life for many university students. Statistics from Melbourne University show that living expenses (excluding course fees) for a student in share accommodation amount annually to around $25,000. Most students must work at least one job to supplement the meagre government-provided youth allowance, which, if paid at the maximum rate of $425 per fortnight, amounts to just $11,050 per annum.

It is little wonder then that the March 2 Melbourne Age reported that up to 40% of women working in the city’s brothels are full-time tertiary students, most of whom engage in prostitution to meet the high cost of study.

This is not a case of women freely choosing to take part in sex work. It is a consequence of a welfare system designed to punish the poor, who, more often than not, are women. It is a “choice” that has been forced onto these students, as with most prostitutes, by economic necessity.

The capitalist family system, based on women’s economic dependence on men (their father or husband), makes women primarily responsible for (unpaid) household cooking, cleaning and child-rearing. This limits their educational and employment opportunities and ensures continued economic dependence on an individual man (the family “bread-winner”). The concentration of working women into low-paid, highly casualised industries is testament to this.

Under capitalism, a woman’s body is regarded as little more than a marketing tool. Images of women are used to sell everything from cars to mobile phones. The multi-billion dollar “beauty” industry is built on convincing every woman that she, as she is, is unworthy of love or respect, and so must spend an inordinate amount of money “improving” her appearance. Magazines targeted at women give her “helpful” hints on how to use her body to achieve that pinnacle of female achievement, catching and keeping a husband.

The sexual commodification of women, together with capitalism’s pro-family ideology, reinforces the fundamentally sexist notion that women’s principal sexual role is to gratify men.

It is these social relations that prostitution is based upon. It arose not as an expression of women’s sexuality, but as a consequence of their economic dependence on men.

The key aspect of prostitution is the purchase for money of a woman’s body for the purpose of a man’s sexual gratification. Even if a woman is able to choose her clientele, or proscribe particular sexual acts, the fact remains that for a period of time, the customer owns the woman. She is a thing to be used for the sexual gratification of another person; she is expected to have no emotions, ideas or desires of her own.

While there exist prostitutes who believe that their work “empowers” them, this regular treatment as a sexual commodity cannot but have a negative impact on a woman’s sense of self-worth, on her perception that she has a right to be treated as a person, not a sex object.

Conservative commentators and some feminists have argued that prostitution should be illegal, claiming that this will discourage the practice. However, it is prostitutes themselves who always bear the brunt of anti-prostitution laws. Forcing prostitution underground leaves women open to ever more dangerous situations, and removes the opportunity for collective organisation that working in a brothel may permit.

Socialists argue for the removal of all laws that penalise prostitutes and fully support the self-organisation of sex workers to campaign for better health and work safety. Such collective action helps raise prostitutes’ self-confidence and organisational skills, enabling them to fight more effectively against their oppression.

The availability of real choices for women with regard to work and education is essential if they are to break from the shackles imposed by sexist attitudes and practices. A woman who is not willing to be limited by the “marriage, kids and housework” formula for her life and who understands that collective political action is needed to defend women’s rights, can become an invaluable fighter in the movement that seeks to eradicate women’s oppression altogether.

From: Comment & Analysis, Green Left Weekly issue #743 12 March 2008.
Education
High rents a burden for students
Jewel Topsfield
492 words
21 April 2008
First
5
English
© 2008 Copyright John Fairfax Holdings Limited. www.theage.com.au

A top vice-chancellor warns on housing costs. By Jewel Topsfield.

STUDENT housing costs are an insurmountable financial burden for many poor and indigenous students, according to Australian National University vice-chancellor Ian Chubb.

His warning came as the body representing the country's 38 universities, Universities Australia, called on the Federal Government to consider dropping the age of independence for Youth Allowance and Austudy from 25 to 18.

A study found children from wealthy families are three times more likely to attend university than those from low socio-economic backgrounds.

Professor Chubb said last week the policy of restricting Austudy to those aged 25 or older would be a "silly outcome" in the future.

"The level of student income has not kept pace with the cost of living, especially with the spiralling accommodation costs," Professor Chubb told a conference of college and university housing officers.

"The tight rental market in many cities is causing severe problems for large numbers of students who need to move to study at the institution that offers the course of their choice."

Professor Chubb said the accommodation problems worsened an already grim situation where:

· 71% of undergraduates averaged 14.8 hours of paid work a week;

· one student in eight regularly goes without food because they are so broke;

· the proportion of students able to receive Youth Allowance or Austudy has fallen by one sixth since 2000;

· 40% of full-time undergraduates say paid work harms their studies and one in four are taking out loans to meet living costs.

Professor Chubb said the student income support system had not been properly reviewed by the Government since 1992 and there was an urgent need for reform.

"It is hard to disagree with a Senate inquiry that found in 2005 that income support for students had suffered from policy neglect and bureaucratic inertia."

Not being willing or able to borrow enough money should never be the major barrier to higher education in a civilised society, he said.

Universities Australia also called on the Federal Government to set equity targets, with financial incentives for universities to recruit and retain poor students.

The National Union of Students said the Government needed to improve income support to address the perception that going to university means living in poverty.

"Again and again we hear stories about students missing classes in order to work excessive hours to pay rent and cover basic living expenses," said president Angus McFarland.

Federal Education Minister Julia Gillard said students must not be excluded from higher education on the basis of their socio-economic background, gender, disability or geography.

"I will consider the recommendations with interest," Ms Gillard said.

"Many of the issues raised, including a review of income support arrangements, government support for equity programs at university, and social inclusion strategies for higher education, will be examined in the Review of Higher Education."